S&M you have to look into Predictive History, his videos are good but his SUBSTACK is just mind-blowing. He is kinda like you but Chinese. He aims to create a new Religion/Civilization, accusations of child abuse (false because some lifeguards got angry he disciplined his child to hardly). He evens goes into the concept of collective consciousness similar to what you have talked about. He is steadily climbing on YouTube while sharing some forbidden knowledge you have to make a video about him.
You should invite him to have a conversation with you!!
I'm the short term, perhaps, but for any appreciable length of time, i.e. any kind of decision you may later be stuck in and have to live with, well...
Scarcity drives demand. Unique capacity drives opportunity. Converting something previously considered waste into a valuable resource is one of the best, and often exceptionally enduring of the top types of innovation solutions. Current college grads are having unprecedented difficulties getting work. Young people have unmatched potential for adaptation. There is going to be an entire orchard of solutions with figuratively s such plentiful low hanging fruit that it may take tens or even hundreds of generations, i.e. an entirely new era, to fully exploit just those opportunities.
Anyone choosing to be left behind might quickly find themselves in slight company. You choose: A. Deny what may be the greatest gift humanity has received since, what, maybe fire. B. Try it out, keep exploring and playing until you find what works.
Sure, most/many in the #A camp will be able to point to all the people in the #B camp getting burnt, but the longer they stay there, the more they will be left out in the cold, defenseless, without this magical process that could prevent illness, magically produce exceptionally better food, and scare/chase away their worse enemies, Including Fire Itself!
Someone remind me, what was the name of those peoples or tribe that succeeded and thrived after everyone else adapted fire?... Oh yeah. 😂
Re: Asperger's vs Autism getting separated after further/deeper discoveries.
Quite likely for several reasons.
1. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) is a very pragmatic work built primarily for the benefit of practitioners treating patients. Therefore, once you develop clear cut differentiators/divisions in tests/conditions, then there should no longer be any reason to jumble previously separate conditions together. The reason this happened between version 4 and 5 was due to research demonstrating an inability to find/create any meaningful boundaries/demarcations between conditions, i.e. there was too much overlap in both diagnosis and treatments.
This may yet prove constructive though because there is no general guarantee/reason (that I am aware of) for the new divisions to match the old. Rather, there may be more layers, e.g. starting with base gemological, environmental, neurological, phenotypical, etc. causes (think condition potentials) > activation > correction > reinforcement > expression > treatment > outcome.
AI could allow vastly better management and resolution of more detailed information which could for all practical purposes lead to coordination of individualized medicine at the patient level with realtime bidirectional feedback to aggregate samples at nearly the population level across almost all factors.
Initially this might run into speed bumps due to previous misunderstandings and bad assumptions then greatly exacerbated by bad science, i.e. the replication crisis.
However, the effect could be experimental growth along multiple dimensions: A. Removal of bad actors/data/assumptions. B. Previously unimaginable ability to visualize and comprehend subject matter across most/all methodologies simultaneously. C. Finding/Focusing breakthrough/work at key (nexies/nexuses?) that could allow rapid/interactive simplification of the problem, i.e. dividing combinatorial complexity by the factorial of iterations.
2. People organize better along shared/cooperative development paths. If/when AI starts to implode past rent seeking / problem owning / corruption, such that issues get properly identified and comprehensive resolutions do away with symptom only solutions... Well, that would presumably change a while lot more than just our current approach in medicine from illness to wellness.
S&M you have to look into Predictive History, his videos are good but his SUBSTACK is just mind-blowing. He is kinda like you but Chinese. He aims to create a new Religion/Civilization, accusations of child abuse (false because some lifeguards got angry he disciplined his child to hardly). He evens goes into the concept of collective consciousness similar to what you have talked about. He is steadily climbing on YouTube while sharing some forbidden knowledge you have to make a video about him.
You should invite him to have a conversation with you!!
Thank you very much for the tip!!
Re: Hoping for / betting on AI stagnation.
I'm the short term, perhaps, but for any appreciable length of time, i.e. any kind of decision you may later be stuck in and have to live with, well...
Scarcity drives demand. Unique capacity drives opportunity. Converting something previously considered waste into a valuable resource is one of the best, and often exceptionally enduring of the top types of innovation solutions. Current college grads are having unprecedented difficulties getting work. Young people have unmatched potential for adaptation. There is going to be an entire orchard of solutions with figuratively s such plentiful low hanging fruit that it may take tens or even hundreds of generations, i.e. an entirely new era, to fully exploit just those opportunities.
Anyone choosing to be left behind might quickly find themselves in slight company. You choose: A. Deny what may be the greatest gift humanity has received since, what, maybe fire. B. Try it out, keep exploring and playing until you find what works.
Sure, most/many in the #A camp will be able to point to all the people in the #B camp getting burnt, but the longer they stay there, the more they will be left out in the cold, defenseless, without this magical process that could prevent illness, magically produce exceptionally better food, and scare/chase away their worse enemies, Including Fire Itself!
Someone remind me, what was the name of those peoples or tribe that succeeded and thrived after everyone else adapted fire?... Oh yeah. 😂
Re: Asperger's vs Autism getting separated after further/deeper discoveries.
Quite likely for several reasons.
1. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) is a very pragmatic work built primarily for the benefit of practitioners treating patients. Therefore, once you develop clear cut differentiators/divisions in tests/conditions, then there should no longer be any reason to jumble previously separate conditions together. The reason this happened between version 4 and 5 was due to research demonstrating an inability to find/create any meaningful boundaries/demarcations between conditions, i.e. there was too much overlap in both diagnosis and treatments.
This may yet prove constructive though because there is no general guarantee/reason (that I am aware of) for the new divisions to match the old. Rather, there may be more layers, e.g. starting with base gemological, environmental, neurological, phenotypical, etc. causes (think condition potentials) > activation > correction > reinforcement > expression > treatment > outcome.
AI could allow vastly better management and resolution of more detailed information which could for all practical purposes lead to coordination of individualized medicine at the patient level with realtime bidirectional feedback to aggregate samples at nearly the population level across almost all factors.
Initially this might run into speed bumps due to previous misunderstandings and bad assumptions then greatly exacerbated by bad science, i.e. the replication crisis.
However, the effect could be experimental growth along multiple dimensions: A. Removal of bad actors/data/assumptions. B. Previously unimaginable ability to visualize and comprehend subject matter across most/all methodologies simultaneously. C. Finding/Focusing breakthrough/work at key (nexies/nexuses?) that could allow rapid/interactive simplification of the problem, i.e. dividing combinatorial complexity by the factorial of iterations.
2. People organize better along shared/cooperative development paths. If/when AI starts to implode past rent seeking / problem owning / corruption, such that issues get properly identified and comprehensive resolutions do away with symptom only solutions... Well, that would presumably change a while lot more than just our current approach in medicine from illness to wellness.
We're looking forward to that next stage for Autism. ^_^
"Is AI Overhyped?"
Of course, like most things. Computers do what they are told, even if a LLM system controls them.